La doctrina de Dios en Lutero, Calvino y Arminio – Parte II: Metodología y presuposiciones

Authors

  • Marcos Blanco Asociación Casa Editora Sudamericana Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/rt.v33i1.1047

Keywords:

Doctrina de Dios, Martín Lutero, Juan Calvino, Jacobo Arminio, presuposiciones hermenéuticas

Abstract

La ruptura de Lutero, Calvino y Arminio con doctrinas de la teología clásica, tales como la justificación por las obras y una eclesiología clerical, es innegable. Sin embargo, es importante preguntarse si esta reforma incluyó la doctrina de Dios, dada su centralidad para todo el sistema teológico. Este artículo es el segundo de una serie de tres artículos cuyo objetivo es comparar la metodología y las presuposiciones hermenéuticas de Lutero, Calvino y Arminio con las del teísmo clásico (teología católico escolástica) para determinar si ellos se apartaron de la metodología de la sola Scriptura para elaborar la doctrina de Dios, siguiendo la metodología de múltiples fuentes de la teología clásica.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-10

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Revista Theologika

Section

Artículos

License

  1. The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution non commercial (CC BY NC) license, which allows third parties to use the published information for non commercial purposes as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
  2. Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
  3. Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).