Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation

Authors

  • Ángel Manuel Rodríguez Biblical Research Institute of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/rt.v36i2.1674

Keywords:

Universal legal justification, Arminianism, Calvinism, soteriology, substitution

Abstract

Universal legal justification attempts to provide a third alternative to the Reformed-Arminian debate over the nature and extent of salvation. This article summarizes some of the most important arguments used by the proponents of universal legal justification to support their theology and provides an evaluation of its view, demonstrating that it does not really provide a third alternative to Arminianism and Calvinism. Further, assuming universal legal justification implies that there is hardly any room left for Christ’s work of mediation before the Father in heaven. Finally, universal legal justification’s interpretation of the Pauline phrases “in Adam” and “in Christ,” as well as its understanding of substitution in connection with the use of the "in Christ"motif, is problematic.

Author Biography

Ángel Manuel Rodríguez, Biblical Research Institute of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

Ángel Manuel Rodríguez holds a ThD in Religion from Andrews University. His field is Old Testament. He has been director for many years of the Biblical Research Institute of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. He currently continues to serve as a part-time associate director of the same institution.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-29

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Revista Theologika

Section

Artículos

License

  1. The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution non commercial (CC BY NC) license, which allows third parties to use the published information for non commercial purposes as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
  2. Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
  3. Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).