Daniel 11:2b–12:3

A Structural Proposal and Its Contribution to the Whole Book of Daniel (Part I)

Authors

  • Héctor Urrutia-Hernández Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/rt.v38i1.2097

Keywords:

Daniel 11:2b–12:3, literary structure, preterism, futurism, historicism

Abstract

This study is presented in two parts, with the current article focusing on the macrostructure of Daniel 11:2b–12:3. By analyzing the Hebrew text, this article aims to uncover the underlying literary structure of this passage, which is crucial for achieving a coherent interpretation. The proposed structure identifies seven sections within Daniel 10–12, forming a chiasm centered on the pericope concerning the Roman kings (11:16-30). This central section notably highlights the Messiah’s death (11:22b), underscoring its pivotal role in the revelation and its significance throughout the entire book of Daniel.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-05

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023): Revista Theologika

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Héctor Urrutia-Hernández

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

  1. The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution non commercial (CC BY NC) license, which allows third parties to use the published information for non commercial purposes as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
  2. Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
  3. Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).